Manatee County REC; We The People -vs- The Establishment
Healing Begins from the Emotional Blackmail
Emotional blackmail is a dysfunctional form of manipulation that people use to place demands and threaten victims to get what they want.
The undertone of emotional blackmail is if you don’t do what I want when I want it, you will suffer.
She describes how emotional blackmail tactics are used by abusers to threaten in order to get what they want. In placing demands and threats, they create feelings of fear, guilt, and anger to solicit compliance from their victims. In doing so, they divert blame and responsibility to the victim for their own negative actions. –Karen Doll, Psy.D., L.P. in Positive Psychology
Monday’s Manatee County Republican Executive Committee MCREC meeting was a powerful organic galvanization of We the People. For those who aren’t familiar with Robert’s Rules of Order, the Chair has some basic responsibilities. First, she needs to be impartial during debates, and she needs to recognize members to give them the floor to speak. This meeting started much like the December meeting, with the Chair, April Culbreath, taking the microphone, chiding the crowd, and lecturing on how the meeting would go. From there, Garin Hoover stood up, raised his hand, and asked to be recognized. The Chair, April Culbreath, very conspicuously and incorrectly ignored him. He persisted in requesting to be recognized. And she persisted in ignoring him. Remarkably, no one else spoke or made any other comments.
April said she would not respond to “those kinds” of comments or people. At this point, Garin criticized April’s performance as chair, which had brought about so much disunity and dysfunction. Then, the crowd erupted in approval of Garin’s comments. At this point, April began to pack her things. Kevin Van Ostenbridge then walked up to April and looked like he gave her counsel, and she walked around, gathered some things, and left with County Commissioner Kevin Van Ostenbridge, candidate Keith Green, and Steve Vernon. It was the Anthony Pedicini gang. There may have been a few others as well.
But the vast majority stayed. Somebody that April had asked to lead the prayer in December got up to lead the group in prayer as is customary at our meetings. But instead of praying, she continued to lecture on how disrespectful and improper the members were. She even said that God is ashamed of them/us. I heard a comment from the crowd, “So if we disagree with you, then God is ashamed of us?!?!?” It was a poignant moment of clarity for many of us.
Shortly after this comment, the crowd spontaneously prayed the Lord’s Prayer. It was a loud, defiant, and powerful statement that we can pray ourselves and don’t need the condescending lecture from a presumed moral superior. After the prayer, and without being directed, the group gave the pledge of allegiance, and then we all sang the national anthem with a renewed sense of patriotism and unity.
After a few minutes of trying to ascertain what had happened, did April quit, or did she walk out of the meeting, the group, led by our newly elected secretary, Sandra Freese, and Treasurer, Jacqueline Heisse, looked to Nathan Knight as the vice chair to call the meeting to order. He did, and together, the REC modified the agenda and went through the meeting. There were plenty of disagreements, but everybody’s voice was heard. Vigorous debate on various issues took place in an orderly and respectful fashion. Difficult decisions were made as a group. One of those decisions was a vote of no-confidence in Chair April Culbreath. This vote was unanimous, from what I could tell. Continuing the success of January’s special meeting, we finished all the items on the agenda and ended early. Everybody I could see left the meeting satisfied that business was taken care of professionally and productively, just like the special meeting that took place in January without the Chair.
One event that happened during the meeting would be easy to overlook, but I believe its implications are powerful and far-reaching. A member felt the need to apologize to an old friend and everybody in general because she didn’t believe what other members had warned about April and the division she, and that small group, had caused. She was quickly forgiven and appreciated by the individual and the group as a whole. The courage it took to speak those words in such a public setting was remarkable. Most people walk away after having been burned. This person didn’t. She persisted and now leads by her example and gives others a path back to unity and healing. This is another first step in the healing process.
But what are we even healing from? We are healing from the divisive effects of Emotional Blackmail. It is a manipulative attitude that states, “If you disagree with us, then God is ashamed of you.” “If you don’t like what we are doing, then you are causing disruption.” And “If you don’t agree with me, then you are helping the democrats, and all of the problems in the country are because you can’t get along with us.”
Healing is happening around the shared values that we, as Americans, all hold dear. It was this healing that I had referred to in my campaign kickoff meeting back in October.
Those American values of a love for freedom and a defiance of tyranny. Tyranny in all different shapes and sizes, from political manipulations, lawfare through rules, and intimidation and emotional blackmail. The current chair has lost the consent of the governed, and her small group has been desperately seeking some legal loophole to discredit the majority. The 90+ members wanted to have their voices heard and to participate in the political process. They held firm to ensure that the voice of, We the People, was not silenced.
To find out other ways you can join the campaign or to join us for my first-ever Zoom Townhall Meeting on 3/5 at 6:30pm please visit:
Very powerful Eddie. We the people will no longer be ignored!
Thank you for putting this out Eddie!
Note to those who left: It may have seemed the meeting was adjourned because the Chair said so, but there are actually 2 major problems with that conclusion: 1) The meeting was never called to order and therefore could not possibly be adjourned; 2) The chair did not have the authority to adjourn the meeting without a motion (described in Robert's Rules 8:9) and no motion to adjourn was made.
The February 26th regular meeting occurred after the chair left.
Roberts Rules 47:11 Temporary occupants of the chair. If it is necessary for the president to vacate the chair during a meeting, or if the chair is absent, the chair is occupied temporarily by another
(1) A vice-president. If the president for any reason vacates the chair or is absent, the vice-president or first vice-president takes the chair
Many of the members in the MREC don't know, or choose to ignore, the party rules, the county constitution, and Roberts Rules. This is a common theme in almost every county in the state of Florida.
RPOF County Model Constitution
ARTICLE X: PARLIAMENTARY AUTHORITY
The latest revision of “Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised” shall be constituted as the authority governing the rules of procedure
Some basic Roberts Rules
41:63 Changing an Agenda. When the adoption of a proposed agenda is pending, it is subject to amendment by majority vote.
4:4 Making a Motion. To make a main motion, a member must obtain the floor, as explained above, when no other question is pending and when business of the kind represented by the motion is in order.
Deciphered, it says that if someone makes a motion and during discussion another person makes a completely different motion, the maker of the second motion is out of order. A motion made that pertains to the business at hand is in order, such as amending the agenda prior to it's adoption. Motions can be planned in advance or they can be organic from the floor. This is why we voted against only allowing motions during New Business at our December meeting.
Debate
4:28 ...In the debate, each member has the right to speak twice on the same question on the same day, but cannot make a second speech on the same question so long as any member who has not spoken on that question desires the floor.
Debate should alternate between opposing opinions as described in 3:33
The reason we have governing docs and rules is so that everyone plays by the same set of rules, including the executive board members and chair. If everyone spends just a little time learning the rules by reading, watching videos, or taking courses, meetings would properly function and we could actually get business done. You can also get quick reference sheets (https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71lonOoXkSL.jpg) for free which show the ranking and incidental motions and their properties.